Writing-wise, this needs work. You regularly break one of the two main rules of clinical tone (Avoid contractions). A large proportion of the wording is really odd, and phrases like 'as if we're actually there' really personify the Foundation in a way which isn't good. The test log adds nothing that isn't already explained in the description; it's completely unnecessary.
You don't explain why the interview is taking place, and I have no idea who Janice Greene is. Also, the interview is cryptic and gives the reader no additional information. Some mystery can work in articles, but this restricts too much information, leaving me with essentially zero narrative. The dialogue also feels very unrealistic. Finally, you really don't need to redact the name. It adds nothing and doesn't look great.
Conceptually, there is definitely quite a lot missing. Due to the over-withholding of information mentioned already, no narrative comes across. And when that's gone, it's literally just a thing that appears in photos. We know nothing about its motives, and it doesn't do anything else. Except, for reasons you haven't explained enough, this one woman could see it. However, she chose to not tell anyone until she was brought in by the Foundation?
I checked out your initial concept thread and the idea there is pretty cool. It just really doesn't come across in the SCP. I had no idea that it just wanted to have a good life, and you didn't take any of Ayers' advice into this. There isn't any interesting narrative progression, but for some reason you made the SCP actually manifest in real life for the interview. I much preferred it only existing in photographic form. Really, this just needs more development.
